Press Releases from the EVU
Prejudice against vegetarian nutrition
24 February 2005
It is not new that attempts are being made to discredit the vegetarian
way of life. The most recent case is a particularly remarkable combination
of scientifically untenable statements, extreme living conditions of the
children under observation, and obvious financial involvement of the meat
industry.
Speaking at the American Association for the Advancement of Science in
Washington, Prof. Lindsay Allen of the University of California made serious
accusations: "Animal source foods have some nutrients which are not
found anywhere else. If you're talking about feeding young children and
pregnant women and lactating women I would go as far as to say it is unethical
to withhold these foods during that period of life."
Unethical? The European Vegetarian Union, an umbrella for most European
Vegetarian Organisations, wants to put the record straight:
1. Professor Allen's lecture was based on a study (1) with 544 children
in Kenya who ate a very unbalanced diet, many suffered from several health
problems, including amebiasis, a source of intestinal blood loss which
leads to a deficiency of B12 and iron. It is well known that vitamin B12
deficiency can impair the cognitive development of children and so it
comes as no surprise that additional B12 brought about positive health
effects. However, even though the children suffered from multiple micronutrient
deficiencies, increased plasma Vitamin B-12 proved to be the only detectable
micronutrient response to meat or milk supplementation. (2)
However, it must be stressed that of the three tests (Raven's Progressive
Matrices test, verbal meaning and arithmetic) only the first shows a better
development of the meat-group. Regarding the verbal meaning and arithmetic
tests, the nutrition supplement without any animal products (but with
vegetable oil) shows the best results. In all three tests the milk-group
had the poorest results; the Raven-test results in that group were even
worse than in the control group. If these malnourished children had received
a carefully planned vegetarian diet, their health would have improved
even more.
2. In some newspapers, reference is made to unspecified "studies
of vegetarians in both the United States and Europe/Holland" implying
that missing out on meat and dairy products could permanently damage a
child's development.
a. These reports are challenged by living
proof:
- Indians have been vegetarians for hundreds or even thousands of years.
There is not the slightest indication that this way of life has "impaired"
them in any way - just the opposite.
- Children in some European families are vegetarians in the fourth or
fifth generation and they are bright and healthy.
Long term vegetarians are appalled by the statements of Prof Allen. Sir
Paul McCartney, himself father of four healthy and successful vegetarian
children, dismisses her claims as "rubbish".
b. In their position paper "Vegetarian Diets", the American
Dietetic Association and Dietitians of Canada (ADA), the nation's largest
organization of food and nutrition professionals with nearly 70,000 members,
states that "appropriately planned vegetarian diets are healthful,
nutritionally adequate, and provide health benefits in the prevention
and treatment of certain diseases. […] Wellplanned vegan and other
types of vegetarian diets are appropriate for all stages of the life cycle,
including during pregnancy, lactation, infancy, childhood, and adolescence.
Vegetarian diets offer a number of nutritional benefits…"(3)
3. Even to impartial observers, the research mentioned by Professor Allen
raises some doubts as to its neutrality: it was presented at the conference
"Animal Source Foods and Nutrition in Developing Countries"
held in Washington, D.C. June 24-26, 2002 and sponsored by Global Livestock-CRSP.
Supplement publication was supported by Food and Agriculture Organization,
Land O'Lakes Inc., Heifer International, Pond Dynamics and Aquaculture-CRSP.
The National Cattleman's Beef Association partly supported the project.
Conclusion: The European Vegetarian Union wants to point out that a vegetarian
diet needs to be balanced, just like any other one. However, comprehensive
studies conducted over long periods and with thousands of participants
have proven again and again that the vegetarian way of life is a very
healthy one.
Renato Pichler
Acting President
European Vegetarian Union
Footnotes:
(1)www.nutrition.org/ cgi/content/ full/133/11/3941S
(2)www.nutrition.org/ cgi/content/ full/133/11/3972S
(3)www.eatright.org/Public/NutritionInformation/92_17084.cfm
Website link:
www.europeanvegetarian.org/lang/en/news/news.php?id=2120
Statements:
Vegan Society UK - www.europeanvegetarian.org/lang/en/news/news.php?id=2109
VegSource - www.vegsource.com/articles2/ ncbs_vegan_study.htm
VVF - www.vegetarian.org.uk/mediareleases/050221.html
|